Select the track that best fits the primary framing of your paper. Tracks are used for scheduling parallel sessions.
Technology & Society
Digital transformation, AI and social impact, platform governance, data ethics
Education in Transition
Pedagogical innovation, digital learning, education policy, teacher development
Cultural Diversity
Cross-cultural research, identity and representation, equity in institutions
Integrated Methods
Mixed methods, collaborative research design, boundary-crossing frameworks
Research Topics
Research Topics are independent of Conference Tracks and are used for indexing and keyword search in the Book of Abstracts. You may select one or more topics regardless of the track you have chosen — cross-track combinations are welcome and reflect the conference’s interdisciplinary spirit.
Algorithmic Bias & Fairness
AI Regulation & Policy Frameworks
Digital Divide & Marginalized Communities
Teacher AI Literacy & Professional Development
Decolonizing Curriculum & Pedagogy
Mixed-Methods Innovation in Social Research
Surveillance, Privacy & Digital Rights
Youth & Digital Citizenship
Indigenous Knowledge Systems & Technology
Platform Labor & the Gig Economy
Submission Classification
When submitting your abstract, you will be asked to specify three independent choices. These are not linked to one another — please select the combination that genuinely reflects your paper and your presentation preference.
1. Manuscript Type (select one)
• Full Research Paper
• Conceptual / Theoretical Paper
• Case Study & Practice Report
• In-person
• Virtual
Note: In the published conference proceedings, contributions are grouped by Presentation Format — the “Poster Presentations” section of the proceedings, for example, includes all papers presented in Poster Session format, regardless of their Manuscript Type.
Abstract Format & Length
Abstracts must be between 200 and 400 words, written in English, in plain text (no tables, images, footnotes, or reference citations). Please include 3–5 keywords, separated by commas.
Recommended Structure
While abstracts may be written as a single continuous paragraph, we recommend addressing the following elements, in order, to help reviewers quickly grasp the contribution of your work:
• Background — 1–2 sentences establishing the context and the gap your study addresses
• Objective — 1 sentence clearly stating the aim or research question
• Method — 1–2 sentences describing the design, participants, and analytical approach
• Findings — 2–3 sentences summarizing the key results
• Implications — 1–2 sentences on the contribution or significance of the study
Review Process
All submissions are peer reviewed:
Double-blind review
Minimum of two expert reviewers
Evaluated for: originality, research quality, relevance to conference themes, and clarity of presentation.
